本文以“巴纳德会议”为分析点，重点梳理了美国20世纪80年代女权主义“性战”发生的社会背景，以及围绕着色情、女同性恋TP（男女）角色、S/M（虐恋）三个主题的争论而形成的性激进派女权主义与反色情派支配论女权主义这两种女权主义性论述的基本立场、观点分歧及后续影响。20世纪90年代至今包括“性骚扰”在内的诸多争论一定程度上延续了当年的论战，围绕着“危险与快乐：迈向性政治”这一理论框架的女权主义性论述影响至今。而这种影响，尤其是支配论女权主义的论点，显然也已经走出了美国，并与中国大陆产生某种（自觉不自觉的）连接，可是，我们对于这个会议及其性政治的了解、讨论与检视却非常之少（或严重偏颇），当下的很多讨论甚至远不如当年深刻与丰富，且在缺乏充分认识与警惕的情况下容易将其中一派的观点放大为整个女权主义的性立场。对美国20世纪80年代女权主义性论述的梳理，是为了回到中国大陆的当下，观察其与中国大陆的可能关联，探讨进一步推进更为丰富而本土的“性思考”以及扎根于中国的历史文化与现实生活发展另一类 “性论述”的可能。

This paper bases its analysis on the Bernard Conference known as the beginning of the famous feminists’ sex war in 1980s. Surrounding the themes on pornography, lesbian TP roles and S/M issue, the debates under the “pleasure and danger” theoretical framework divided US feminists into two strands: sex radical feminists and anti-porn feminists who are also known as dominance feminism. The significance and influence of sex war has been lasted for more than 30 years, and dominance feminists are still active in sexual politics on issues such as sexual harassment within and beyond US context. The tracing back to 80s sex war and following feminists’ debates on sex issues in US is expected to give insights to better understand what are happening in current mainland China. Thinking sex in Chinese contexts and proposing efforts toward alternative sexuality discourses and statements rooted in local historical, cultural and social worlds are crucial yet challenging.